CaseIH Puma 230 vs New Holland 8970A
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The New Holland 8970A is more powerful than the CaseIH Puma 230: 233 HP versus 231 HP (+2 HP, +1%).
- The CaseIH Puma 230 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2001 for the New Holland 8970A.
- The New Holland 8970A offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6718 kg versus 4626 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 230 | New Holland 8970A | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 231 HP | 233 HP |
| Production years | 2011–2013 | 2001–2003 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 7.5 L |
| Weight | 8 981 kg | — |
| Drive | 4WD | 2WD or 4WD |
| Transmission | CVT | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | — | 16 / 9 |
| Rear lift capacity | 4 626 kg | 6 718 kg |
| Wheelbase | 288 cm | 300 cm |
| Length | — | 538 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 230 or the New Holland 8970A?
The New Holland 8970A is more powerful than the CaseIH Puma 230: 233 HP versus 231 HP (+2 HP, +1%).
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 230 or the New Holland 8970A?
The CaseIH Puma 230 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2001 for the New Holland 8970A.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 230 or the New Holland 8970A?
The New Holland 8970A offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6718 kg versus 4626 kg.