CaseIH STX530 vs Challenger MT965C
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH STX530 is more powerful than the Challenger MT965C: 530 HP versus 525 HP (+5 HP, +1%).
- The Challenger MT965C is the more recent model: production started in 2009, versus 2006 for the CaseIH STX530.
- The CaseIH STX530 is heavier: 24494 kg versus 18038 kg for the Challenger MT965C.
- The CaseIH STX530 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 8899 kg versus 8845 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH STX530 | Challenger MT965C | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 530 HP | 525 HP |
| Production years | 2006 | 2009–2014 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 14.9 L | 18.1 L |
| Weight | 24 494 kg | 18 038 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 16 / 2 | 16 / 4 |
| Rear lift capacity | 8 899 kg | 8 845 kg |
| Wheelbase | 391 cm | 394 cm |
| Length | — | 756 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH STX530 or the Challenger MT965C?
The CaseIH STX530 is more powerful than the Challenger MT965C: 530 HP versus 525 HP (+5 HP, +1%).
Which is more recent, the CaseIH STX530 or the Challenger MT965C?
The Challenger MT965C is the more recent model: production started in 2009, versus 2006 for the CaseIH STX530.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH STX530 or the Challenger MT965C?
The CaseIH STX530 is heavier: 24494 kg versus 18038 kg for the Challenger MT965C.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH STX530 or the Challenger MT965C?
The CaseIH STX530 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 8899 kg versus 8845 kg.