Challenger MT555D vs Massey Ferguson 7170
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Challenger MT555D and the Massey Ferguson 7170 deliver the same power: 170 HP.
- The Challenger MT555D is the more recent model: production started in 2012, versus 2009 for the Massey Ferguson 7170.
- The Massey Ferguson 7170 is heavier: 9348 kg versus 7711 kg for the Challenger MT555D.
- The Challenger MT555D offers a higher rear lift capacity: 5670 kg versus 4699 kg.
Full specs comparison
| Challenger MT555D | Massey Ferguson 7170 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 HP | 170 HP |
| Production years | 2012–2014 | 2009–2019 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.6 L | 6.6 L |
| Weight | 7 711 kg | 9 348 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Synchronized |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | — | 12 / 5 |
| Rear lift capacity | 5 670 kg | 4 699 kg |
| Wheelbase | 299 cm | 307 cm |
| Length | 508 cm | 508 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Challenger MT555D or the Massey Ferguson 7170?
The Challenger MT555D and the Massey Ferguson 7170 deliver the same power: 170 HP.
Which is more recent, the Challenger MT555D or the Massey Ferguson 7170?
The Challenger MT555D is the more recent model: production started in 2012, versus 2009 for the Massey Ferguson 7170.
Which is heavier, the Challenger MT555D or the Massey Ferguson 7170?
The Massey Ferguson 7170 is heavier: 9348 kg versus 7711 kg for the Challenger MT555D.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Challenger MT555D or the Massey Ferguson 7170?
The Challenger MT555D offers a higher rear lift capacity: 5670 kg versus 4699 kg.
Other comparisons
AGCO RT140 vs Massey Ferguson 7170AGCO RT140A vs Massey Ferguson 7170Challenger MT555D vs John Deere 6170MChallenger MT555D vs John Deere 6170RChallenger MT555D vs Massey Ferguson 7619Challenger MT555D vs McCormick Intl X6.480Challenger MT565B vs Massey Ferguson 7170Kubota M7-171 vs Massey Ferguson 7170

