Challenger MT655 vs White 6195
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Challenger MT655 and the White 6195 deliver the same power: 222 HP.
- The Challenger MT655 is the more recent model: production started in 2002, versus 1993 for the White 6195.
- The Challenger MT655 is heavier: 9752 kg versus 7938 kg for the White 6195.
- The Challenger MT655 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 8935 kg versus 4898 kg.
Full specs comparison
| Challenger MT655 | White 6195 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 222 HP | 222 HP |
| Production years | 2002–2003 | 1993–1999 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 8.4 L | 8.3 L |
| Weight | 9 752 kg | 7 938 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | 18 / 9 |
| Rear lift capacity | 8 935 kg | 4 898 kg |
| Wheelbase | 307 cm | 287 cm |
| Length | 515 cm | 479 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Challenger MT655 or the White 6195?
The Challenger MT655 and the White 6195 deliver the same power: 222 HP.
Which is more recent, the Challenger MT655 or the White 6195?
The Challenger MT655 is the more recent model: production started in 2002, versus 1993 for the White 6195.
Which is heavier, the Challenger MT655 or the White 6195?
The Challenger MT655 is heavier: 9752 kg versus 7938 kg for the White 6195.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Challenger MT655 or the White 6195?
The Challenger MT655 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 8935 kg versus 4898 kg.