Challenger MT655E vs Versatile 260
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Challenger MT655E is more powerful than the Versatile 260: 265 HP versus 260 HP (+5 HP, +2%).
- The Versatile 260 is heavier: 10861 kg versus 10800 kg for the Challenger MT655E.
- The Challenger MT655E offers a higher rear lift capacity: 11999 kg versus 8550 kg.
Full specs comparison
| Challenger MT655E | Versatile 260 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 265 HP | 260 HP |
| Production years | 2014–2020 | 2014–2017 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 8.4 L | 8.9 L |
| Weight | 10 800 kg | 10 861 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | CVT | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | — | 16 / 9 |
| Rear lift capacity | 11 999 kg | 8 550 kg |
| Wheelbase | 309 cm | 316 cm |
| Length | 555 cm | 640 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Challenger MT655E or the Versatile 260?
The Challenger MT655E is more powerful than the Versatile 260: 265 HP versus 260 HP (+5 HP, +2%).
Which is heavier, the Challenger MT655E or the Versatile 260?
The Versatile 260 is heavier: 10861 kg versus 10800 kg for the Challenger MT655E.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Challenger MT655E or the Versatile 260?
The Challenger MT655E offers a higher rear lift capacity: 11999 kg versus 8550 kg.