Challenger MT965C vs John Deere 9630
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The John Deere 9630 is more powerful than the Challenger MT965C: 530 HP versus 525 HP (+5 HP, +1%).
- The Challenger MT965C is the more recent model: production started in 2009, versus 2007 for the John Deere 9630.
- The Challenger MT965C offers a higher rear lift capacity: 8845 kg versus 6940 kg.
Full specs comparison
| Challenger MT965C | John Deere 9630 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 525 HP | 530 HP |
| Production years | 2009–2014 | 2007–2011 |
| Fuel | Diesel | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 18.1 L | 13.5 L |
| Weight | 18 038 kg | — |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 16 / 4 | 18 / 6 |
| Rear lift capacity | 8 845 kg | 6 940 kg |
| Wheelbase | 394 cm | 350 cm |
| Length | 756 cm | 685 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Challenger MT965C or the John Deere 9630?
The John Deere 9630 is more powerful than the Challenger MT965C: 530 HP versus 525 HP (+5 HP, +1%).
Which is more recent, the Challenger MT965C or the John Deere 9630?
The Challenger MT965C is the more recent model: production started in 2009, versus 2007 for the John Deere 9630.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Challenger MT965C or the John Deere 9630?
The Challenger MT965C offers a higher rear lift capacity: 8845 kg versus 6940 kg.
Other comparisons
CaseIH Steiger 535 vs Challenger MT965CCaseIH Steiger 535QT vs Challenger MT965CCaseIH Steiger 540 Quadtrac vs Challenger MT965CCaseIH Steiger 540 vs Challenger MT965CChallenger MT865B vs John Deere 9630Challenger MT865B vs John Deere 9630TChallenger MT865C vs John Deere 9630Challenger MT865C vs John Deere 9630T