Cub Cadet 7275 vs New Holland 1620
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Cub Cadet 7275 and the New Holland 1620 deliver the same power: 27 HP.
- The Cub Cadet 7275 is heavier: 1217 kg versus 1012 kg for the New Holland 1620.
- The Cub Cadet 7275 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 1000 kg versus 877 kg.
Full specs comparison
| Cub Cadet 7275 | New Holland 1620 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 27 HP | 27 HP |
| Production years | 1996–1997 | 1996–1997 |
| Fuel | — | Diesel |
| Cylinders | — | 3 |
| Displacement | 1.5 L | 1.3 L |
| Weight | 1 217 kg | 1 012 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 2WD or 4WD |
| Transmission | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic |
| Rear lift capacity | 1 000 kg | 877 kg |
| Wheelbase | 170 cm | 160 cm |
| Length | 292 cm | 285 cm |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Cub Cadet 7275 or the New Holland 1620?
The Cub Cadet 7275 and the New Holland 1620 deliver the same power: 27 HP.
Which is heavier, the Cub Cadet 7275 or the New Holland 1620?
The Cub Cadet 7275 is heavier: 1217 kg versus 1012 kg for the New Holland 1620.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Cub Cadet 7275 or the New Holland 1620?
The Cub Cadet 7275 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 1000 kg versus 877 kg.