Erkunt Kismet 50E vs Massey Ferguson 148
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Erkunt Kismet 50E and the Massey Ferguson 148 deliver the same power: 49 HP.
- The Erkunt Kismet 50E is the more recent model: production started in 2010, versus 1972 for the Massey Ferguson 148.
- The Erkunt Kismet 50E is heavier: 2100 kg versus 1784 kg for the Massey Ferguson 148.
- The Erkunt Kismet 50E offers a higher rear lift capacity: 2199 kg versus 1449 kg.
Full specs comparison
| Erkunt Kismet 50E | Massey Ferguson 148 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 49 HP | 49 HP |
| Production years | 2010–2020 | 1972–1976 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 |
| Displacement | 2.8 L | 2.5 L |
| Weight | 2 100 kg | 1 784 kg |
| Drive | 2WD or 4WD | 2WD |
| Transmission | Shuttle | — |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | — | 8 / 2 |
| Rear lift capacity | 2 199 kg | 1 449 kg |
| Wheelbase | 194 cm | 204 cm |
| Length | — | 326 cm |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Erkunt Kismet 50E or the Massey Ferguson 148?
The Erkunt Kismet 50E and the Massey Ferguson 148 deliver the same power: 49 HP.
Which is more recent, the Erkunt Kismet 50E or the Massey Ferguson 148?
The Erkunt Kismet 50E is the more recent model: production started in 2010, versus 1972 for the Massey Ferguson 148.
Which is heavier, the Erkunt Kismet 50E or the Massey Ferguson 148?
The Erkunt Kismet 50E is heavier: 2100 kg versus 1784 kg for the Massey Ferguson 148.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Erkunt Kismet 50E or the Massey Ferguson 148?
The Erkunt Kismet 50E offers a higher rear lift capacity: 2199 kg versus 1449 kg.
Other comparisons
Erkunt Kismet 50E vs John Deere 50FErkunt Kismet 50E vs John Deere 50RErkunt Kismet 50E vs Kubota L4760Erkunt Kismet 50E vs Kubota MX4800International Harvester 454 vs Massey Ferguson 148International Harvester 464 vs Massey Ferguson 148Massey Ferguson 148 vs Renault 486Massey Ferguson 148 vs Renault 86