Ford FW-35 vs Versatile 756
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Ford FW-35 is more powerful than the Versatile 756: 195 HP versus 190 HP (+5 HP, +3%).
- The Versatile 756 is heavier: 9525 kg versus 9300 kg for the Ford FW-35.
- The Ford FW-35 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6860 kg versus 4710 kg.
Full specs comparison
| Ford FW-35 | Versatile 756 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 195 HP | 190 HP |
| Production years | 1986–1988 | 1986 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.6 L | 8.3 L |
| Weight | 9 300 kg | 9 525 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | — |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 16 / 4 | 15 / 5 |
| Rear lift capacity | 6 860 kg | 4 710 kg |
| Wheelbase | 342 cm | 330 cm |
| Length | 660 cm | — |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Ford FW-35 or the Versatile 756?
The Ford FW-35 is more powerful than the Versatile 756: 195 HP versus 190 HP (+5 HP, +3%).
Which is heavier, the Ford FW-35 or the Versatile 756?
The Versatile 756 is heavier: 9525 kg versus 9300 kg for the Ford FW-35.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Ford FW-35 or the Versatile 756?
The Ford FW-35 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6860 kg versus 4710 kg.