Hurlimann H-1500 SX vs Massey Ferguson 6616
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Hurlimann H-1500 SX and the Massey Ferguson 6616 deliver the same power: 150 HP.
- The Massey Ferguson 6616 is the more recent model: production started in 2014, versus 1998 for the Hurlimann H-1500 SX.
- The Hurlimann H-1500 SX is heavier: 6100 kg versus 5670 kg for the Massey Ferguson 6616.
- The Hurlimann H-1500 SX offers a higher rear lift capacity: 8601 kg versus 5171 kg.
Full specs comparison
| Hurlimann H-1500 SX | Massey Ferguson 6616 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 150 HP | 150 HP |
| Production years | 1998–2004 | 2014–2016 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 |
| Displacement | 6 L | 4.9 L |
| Weight | 6 100 kg | 5 670 kg |
| Drive | 2WD or 4WD | — |
| Transmission | — | Power shift |
| Rear lift capacity | 8 601 kg | 5 171 kg |
| Wheelbase | 275 cm | 266 cm |
| Length | 467 cm | 469 cm |
| Cab | — | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Hurlimann H-1500 SX or the Massey Ferguson 6616?
The Hurlimann H-1500 SX and the Massey Ferguson 6616 deliver the same power: 150 HP.
Which is more recent, the Hurlimann H-1500 SX or the Massey Ferguson 6616?
The Massey Ferguson 6616 is the more recent model: production started in 2014, versus 1998 for the Hurlimann H-1500 SX.
Which is heavier, the Hurlimann H-1500 SX or the Massey Ferguson 6616?
The Hurlimann H-1500 SX is heavier: 6100 kg versus 5670 kg for the Massey Ferguson 6616.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Hurlimann H-1500 SX or the Massey Ferguson 6616?
The Hurlimann H-1500 SX offers a higher rear lift capacity: 8601 kg versus 5171 kg.
Other comparisons
CaseIH Puma 150 vs Massey Ferguson 6616Challenger MT495D vs Massey Ferguson 6616Challenger MT535D vs Massey Ferguson 6616Hurlimann H-1500 SX vs Massey Ferguson 8220Hurlimann H-1500 SX vs New Holland TM150Hurlimann H-1500 SX vs Renault Ares 815Hurlimann H-1500 SX vs SAME Rubin 150Kubota M7-151 vs Massey Ferguson 6616