Iseki TJ55 vs McCormick Intl CX50
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Iseki TJ55 is more powerful than the McCormick Intl CX50: 54 HP versus 53 HP (+1 HP, +2%).
- The Iseki TJ55 is the more recent model: production started in 2004, versus 2000 for the McCormick Intl CX50.
- The McCormick Intl CX50 is heavier: 3235 kg versus 2360 kg for the Iseki TJ55.
Full specs comparison
| Iseki TJ55 | McCormick Intl CX50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 54 HP | 53 HP |
| Production years | 2004–2009 | 2000–2004 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 4 | 3 |
| Displacement | 3 L | 2.7 L |
| Weight | 2 360 kg | 3 235 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 2WD or 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Shuttle |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | — | 16 / 8 |
| Rear lift capacity | — | 2 039 kg |
| Wheelbase | 215 cm | 215 cm |
| Length | 379 cm | 406 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Iseki TJ55 or the McCormick Intl CX50?
The Iseki TJ55 is more powerful than the McCormick Intl CX50: 54 HP versus 53 HP (+1 HP, +2%).
Which is more recent, the Iseki TJ55 or the McCormick Intl CX50?
The Iseki TJ55 is the more recent model: production started in 2004, versus 2000 for the McCormick Intl CX50.
Which is heavier, the Iseki TJ55 or the McCormick Intl CX50?
The McCormick Intl CX50 is heavier: 3235 kg versus 2360 kg for the Iseki TJ55.