John Deere 2940 vs McCormick Intl X10.90M
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The John Deere 2940 and the McCormick Intl X10.90M deliver the same power: 91 HP.
- The McCormick Intl X10.90M is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 1980 for the John Deere 2940.
- The McCormick Intl X10.90M offers a higher rear lift capacity: 2399 kg versus 1088 kg.
Full specs comparison
| John Deere 2940 | McCormick Intl X10.90M | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 91 HP | 91 HP |
| Production years | 1980–1982 | 2011–2014 |
| Fuel | — | Diesel |
| Cylinders | — | 4 |
| Displacement | 5.9 L | 4.4 L |
| Weight | — | 4 039 kg |
| Drive | 2WD or 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Partial power shift | Shuttle |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 16 / 8 | — |
| Rear lift capacity | 1 088 kg | 2 399 kg |
| Wheelbase | 258 cm | 230 cm |
| Length | 418 cm | 411 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the John Deere 2940 or the McCormick Intl X10.90M?
The John Deere 2940 and the McCormick Intl X10.90M deliver the same power: 91 HP.
Which is more recent, the John Deere 2940 or the McCormick Intl X10.90M?
The McCormick Intl X10.90M is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 1980 for the John Deere 2940.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the John Deere 2940 or the McCormick Intl X10.90M?
The McCormick Intl X10.90M offers a higher rear lift capacity: 2399 kg versus 1088 kg.
Other comparisons
Erkunt Kiymet 90 vs McCormick Intl X10.90MErkunt Kiymet 90E vs McCormick Intl X10.90MErkunt Kiymet 95M vs McCormick Intl X10.90MJohn Deere 2940 vs Renault 103-12 TXJohn Deere 2940 vs Renault 103-14 TXJohn Deere 2940 vs Schluter Compact 850 SpecialJohn Deere 2940 vs Volvo T700McCormick Intl X10.90M vs Solis Solis 90