LS i3030H vs McCormick Intl CT28
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The LS i3030H and the McCormick Intl CT28 deliver the same power: 28 HP.
- The LS i3030H is the more recent model: production started in 2009, versus 2007 for the McCormick Intl CT28.
- The LS i3030H is heavier: 1261 kg versus 1199 kg for the McCormick Intl CT28.
- The McCormick Intl CT28 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 1188 kg versus 820 kg.
Full specs comparison
| LS i3030H | McCormick Intl CT28 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 28 HP | 28 HP |
| Production years | 2009–2010 | 2007–2010 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement | 1.5 L | 1.5 L |
| Weight | 1 261 kg | 1 199 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Hydrostatic | Shuttle |
| Rear lift capacity | 820 kg | 1 188 kg |
| Wheelbase | 166 cm | 165 cm |
| Length | 298 cm | 299 cm |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the LS i3030H or the McCormick Intl CT28?
The LS i3030H and the McCormick Intl CT28 deliver the same power: 28 HP.
Which is more recent, the LS i3030H or the McCormick Intl CT28?
The LS i3030H is the more recent model: production started in 2009, versus 2007 for the McCormick Intl CT28.
Which is heavier, the LS i3030H or the McCormick Intl CT28?
The LS i3030H is heavier: 1261 kg versus 1199 kg for the McCormick Intl CT28.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the LS i3030H or the McCormick Intl CT28?
The McCormick Intl CT28 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 1188 kg versus 820 kg.