Massey Ferguson 1040 vs Rhino 3320
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Massey Ferguson 1040 and the Rhino 3320 deliver the same power: 32 HP.
- The Rhino 3320 is the more recent model: production started in 1995, versus 1984 for the Massey Ferguson 1040.
- The Massey Ferguson 1040 is heavier: 1519 kg versus 1424 kg for the Rhino 3320.
- The Rhino 3320 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 816 kg versus 784 kg.
Full specs comparison
| Massey Ferguson 1040 | Rhino 3320 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 32 HP | 32 HP |
| Production years | 1984–1986 | 1995–1999 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 3 | 2 |
| Displacement | 2 L | 1.7 L |
| Weight | 1 519 kg | 1 424 kg |
| Drive | 2WD or 4WD | 2WD |
| Transmission | Gear | Gear |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 12 / 3 | 8 / 2 |
| Rear lift capacity | 784 kg | 816 kg |
| Wheelbase | 177 cm | 156 cm |
| Length | 292 cm | 276 cm |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Massey Ferguson 1040 or the Rhino 3320?
The Massey Ferguson 1040 and the Rhino 3320 deliver the same power: 32 HP.
Which is more recent, the Massey Ferguson 1040 or the Rhino 3320?
The Rhino 3320 is the more recent model: production started in 1995, versus 1984 for the Massey Ferguson 1040.
Which is heavier, the Massey Ferguson 1040 or the Rhino 3320?
The Massey Ferguson 1040 is heavier: 1519 kg versus 1424 kg for the Rhino 3320.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Massey Ferguson 1040 or the Rhino 3320?
The Rhino 3320 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 816 kg versus 784 kg.