Massey Ferguson 142 vs White 2-50
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Massey Ferguson 142 is more powerful than the White 2-50: 52 HP versus 51 HP (+1 HP, +2%).
- The White 2-50 is the more recent model: production started in 1976, versus 1970 for the Massey Ferguson 142.
- The Massey Ferguson 142 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 1000 kg versus 952 kg.
Full specs comparison
| Massey Ferguson 142 | White 2-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 52 HP | 51 HP |
| Production years | 1970–1980 | 1976–1980 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 |
| Displacement | 2.9 L | 2.6 L |
| Drive | 2WD or 4WD | 2WD or 4WD |
| Transmission | — | Gear |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 8 / 1 | 8 / 2 |
| Rear lift capacity | 1 000 kg | 952 kg |
| Wheelbase | 198 cm | 192 cm |
| Length | — | 295 cm |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Massey Ferguson 142 or the White 2-50?
The Massey Ferguson 142 is more powerful than the White 2-50: 52 HP versus 51 HP (+1 HP, +2%).
Which is more recent, the Massey Ferguson 142 or the White 2-50?
The White 2-50 is the more recent model: production started in 1976, versus 1970 for the Massey Ferguson 142.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Massey Ferguson 142 or the White 2-50?
The Massey Ferguson 142 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 1000 kg versus 952 kg.
Other comparisons
AGCO ST28A vs Massey Ferguson 1428AGCO ST28A vs Massey Ferguson 1429Barreiros 50.55 vs Massey Ferguson 142CaseIH DX23 vs Massey Ferguson 1423Challenger MT225 vs Massey Ferguson 1423Challenger MT255 vs Massey Ferguson 1428Challenger MT255 vs Massey Ferguson 1429Challenger MT255B vs Massey Ferguson 1428