Massey Ferguson 148 vs Twin City FTA
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Massey Ferguson 148 and the Twin City FTA deliver the same power: 49 HP.
- The Massey Ferguson 148 is the more recent model: production started in 1972, versus 1935 for the Twin City FTA.
- The Twin City FTA is heavier: 3138 kg versus 1784 kg for the Massey Ferguson 148.
Full specs comparison
| Massey Ferguson 148 | Twin City FTA | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 49 HP | 49 HP |
| Production years | 1972–1976 | 1935–1938 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 |
| Displacement | 2.5 L | 6.6 L |
| Weight | 1 784 kg | 3 138 kg |
| Drive | 2WD | 2WD |
| Transmission | — | Gear |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 8 / 2 | 3 / 1 |
| Rear lift capacity | 1 449 kg | — |
| Wheelbase | 204 cm | — |
| Length | 326 cm | — |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Massey Ferguson 148 or the Twin City FTA?
The Massey Ferguson 148 and the Twin City FTA deliver the same power: 49 HP.
Which is more recent, the Massey Ferguson 148 or the Twin City FTA?
The Massey Ferguson 148 is the more recent model: production started in 1972, versus 1935 for the Twin City FTA.
Which is heavier, the Massey Ferguson 148 or the Twin City FTA?
The Twin City FTA is heavier: 3138 kg versus 1784 kg for the Massey Ferguson 148.
Other comparisons
Deutz F3M317 vs Twin City FTAInternational Harvester 454 vs Massey Ferguson 148International Harvester 464 vs Massey Ferguson 148Massey Ferguson 148 vs Renault 486Massey Ferguson 148 vs Renault 86McCormick-Deering T-40 vs Twin City FTAMcCormick-Deering TA-40 vs Twin City FTAMcCormick-Deering W-40 vs Twin City FTA