McCormick-Deering Super WD-9 vs Minneapolis-Moline GB
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The McCormick-Deering Super WD-9 is more powerful than the Minneapolis-Moline GB: 72 HP versus 71 HP (+1 HP, +1%).
- The Minneapolis-Moline GB is the more recent model: production started in 1955, versus 1953 for the McCormick-Deering Super WD-9.
- The McCormick-Deering Super WD-9 is heavier: 3311 kg versus 3220 kg for the Minneapolis-Moline GB.
Full specs comparison
| McCormick-Deering Super WD-9 | Minneapolis-Moline GB | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 72 HP | 71 HP |
| Production years | 1953–1956 | 1955–1959 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Propane (LP) |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement | 5.7 L | 6.6 L |
| Weight | 3 311 kg | 3 220 kg |
| Drive | 2WD | 2WD |
| Transmission | Gear | Gear |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 5 / 1 | 5 / 1 |
| Wheelbase | 211 cm | 209 cm |
| Length | 355 cm | 349 cm |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the McCormick-Deering Super WD-9 or the Minneapolis-Moline GB?
The McCormick-Deering Super WD-9 is more powerful than the Minneapolis-Moline GB: 72 HP versus 71 HP (+1 HP, +1%).
Which is more recent, the McCormick-Deering Super WD-9 or the Minneapolis-Moline GB?
The Minneapolis-Moline GB is the more recent model: production started in 1955, versus 1953 for the McCormick-Deering Super WD-9.
Which is heavier, the McCormick-Deering Super WD-9 or the Minneapolis-Moline GB?
The McCormick-Deering Super WD-9 is heavier: 3311 kg versus 3220 kg for the Minneapolis-Moline GB.