McCormick Intl C100 vs Renault 103-52
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The McCormick Intl C100 and the Renault 103-52 deliver the same power: 102 HP.
- The McCormick Intl C100 is the more recent model: production started in 2001, versus 1991 for the Renault 103-52.
- The Renault 103-52 is heavier: 4033 kg versus 2705 kg for the McCormick Intl C100.
- The Renault 103-52 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 3722 kg versus 1661 kg.
Full specs comparison
| McCormick Intl C100 | Renault 103-52 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 102 HP | 102 HP |
| Production years | 2001–2003 | 1991–1997 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement | 4 L | 4.2 L |
| Weight | 2 705 kg | 4 033 kg |
| Drive | 2WD or 4WD | 2WD |
| Transmission | Synchronized | — |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 8 / 4 | — |
| Rear lift capacity | 1 661 kg | 3 722 kg |
| Wheelbase | 214 cm | 251 cm |
| Length | — | 4296 cm |
| Cab | — | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the McCormick Intl C100 or the Renault 103-52?
The McCormick Intl C100 and the Renault 103-52 deliver the same power: 102 HP.
Which is more recent, the McCormick Intl C100 or the Renault 103-52?
The McCormick Intl C100 is the more recent model: production started in 2001, versus 1991 for the Renault 103-52.
Which is heavier, the McCormick Intl C100 or the Renault 103-52?
The Renault 103-52 is heavier: 4033 kg versus 2705 kg for the McCormick Intl C100.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the McCormick Intl C100 or the Renault 103-52?
The Renault 103-52 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 3722 kg versus 1661 kg.