McCormick Intl CT50U vs Montana 4320
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The McCormick Intl CT50U and the Montana 4320 deliver the same power: 43 HP.
- The McCormick Intl CT50U is the more recent model: production started in 2008, versus 2005 for the Montana 4320.
- The Montana 4320 is heavier: 2296 kg versus 2270 kg for the McCormick Intl CT50U.
- The McCormick Intl CT50U offers a higher rear lift capacity: 1496 kg versus 1450 kg.
Full specs comparison
| McCormick Intl CT50U | Montana 4320 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 43 HP | 43 HP |
| Production years | 2008–2010 | 2005–2009 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement | 2.5 L | 2.3 L |
| Weight | 2 270 kg | 2 296 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 2WD |
| Transmission | — | Shuttle |
| Rear lift capacity | 1 496 kg | 1 450 kg |
| Wheelbase | 187 cm | — |
| Length | 317 cm | 319 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the McCormick Intl CT50U or the Montana 4320?
The McCormick Intl CT50U and the Montana 4320 deliver the same power: 43 HP.
Which is more recent, the McCormick Intl CT50U or the Montana 4320?
The McCormick Intl CT50U is the more recent model: production started in 2008, versus 2005 for the Montana 4320.
Which is heavier, the McCormick Intl CT50U or the Montana 4320?
The Montana 4320 is heavier: 2296 kg versus 2270 kg for the McCormick Intl CT50U.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the McCormick Intl CT50U or the Montana 4320?
The McCormick Intl CT50U offers a higher rear lift capacity: 1496 kg versus 1450 kg.