McCormick Intl CT65U vs Montana 5720
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The McCormick Intl CT65U and the Montana 5720 deliver the same power: 57 HP.
- The McCormick Intl CT65U is the more recent model: production started in 2008, versus 2005 for the Montana 5720.
- The Montana 5720 is heavier: 2520 kg versus 2449 kg for the McCormick Intl CT65U.
- The McCormick Intl CT65U offers a higher rear lift capacity: 1750 kg versus 1599 kg.
Full specs comparison
| McCormick Intl CT65U | Montana 5720 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 57 HP | 57 HP |
| Production years | 2008–2010 | 2005–2009 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement | 3.3 L | 3.3 L |
| Weight | 2 449 kg | 2 520 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 2WD |
| Transmission | — | Shuttle |
| Rear lift capacity | 1 750 kg | 1 599 kg |
| Wheelbase | 198 cm | 207 cm |
| Length | 355 cm | 360 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the McCormick Intl CT65U or the Montana 5720?
The McCormick Intl CT65U and the Montana 5720 deliver the same power: 57 HP.
Which is more recent, the McCormick Intl CT65U or the Montana 5720?
The McCormick Intl CT65U is the more recent model: production started in 2008, versus 2005 for the Montana 5720.
Which is heavier, the McCormick Intl CT65U or the Montana 5720?
The Montana 5720 is heavier: 2520 kg versus 2449 kg for the McCormick Intl CT65U.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the McCormick Intl CT65U or the Montana 5720?
The McCormick Intl CT65U offers a higher rear lift capacity: 1750 kg versus 1599 kg.