McCormick Intl CX105 vs Valtra N92

Side-by-side specs comparison

McCormick Intl CX105

McCormick Intl CX105

102 HP · 2003–2007

View full specs
Valtra N92

Valtra N92

101 HP · 2007–2012

View full specs

Verdict by the numbers

  • The McCormick Intl CX105 is more powerful than the Valtra N92: 102 HP versus 101 HP (+1 HP, +1%).
  • The Valtra N92 is the more recent model: production started in 2007, versus 2003 for the McCormick Intl CX105.
  • The Valtra N92 is heavier: 4649 kg versus 3755 kg for the McCormick Intl CX105.
  • The Valtra N92 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 3999 kg versus 3875 kg.

Full specs comparison

McCormick Intl CX105Valtra N92
Power102 HP101 HP
Production years2003–20072007–2012
FuelDieselDiesel
Cylinders44
Displacement4.4 L4.4 L
Weight3 755 kg4 649 kg
Drive2WD or 4WD4WD
TransmissionPartial power shift
Gears (fwd/rev)16 / 8
Rear lift capacity3 875 kg3 999 kg
Wheelbase235 cm253 cm
Length421 cm431 cm
CabYesYes

Frequently asked questions

Which is more powerful, the McCormick Intl CX105 or the Valtra N92?

The McCormick Intl CX105 is more powerful than the Valtra N92: 102 HP versus 101 HP (+1 HP, +1%).

Which is more recent, the McCormick Intl CX105 or the Valtra N92?

The Valtra N92 is the more recent model: production started in 2007, versus 2003 for the McCormick Intl CX105.

Which is heavier, the McCormick Intl CX105 or the Valtra N92?

The Valtra N92 is heavier: 4649 kg versus 3755 kg for the McCormick Intl CX105.

Which has the higher lift capacity, the McCormick Intl CX105 or the Valtra N92?

The Valtra N92 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 3999 kg versus 3875 kg.

Other comparisons