McCormick Intl X10.35M vs Sonalika DI 732 III

Side-by-side specs comparison

McCormick Intl X10.35M

McCormick Intl X10.35M

34 HP · 2011–2014

View full specs
Sonalika DI 732 III

Sonalika DI 732 III

34 HP · 2006–2016

View full specs

Verdict by the numbers

  • The McCormick Intl X10.35M and the Sonalika DI 732 III deliver the same power: 34 HP.
  • The McCormick Intl X10.35M is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2006 for the Sonalika DI 732 III.
  • The McCormick Intl X10.35M is heavier: 1429 kg versus 37 kg for the Sonalika DI 732 III.
  • The Sonalika DI 732 III offers a higher rear lift capacity: 1200 kg versus 800 kg.

Full specs comparison

McCormick Intl X10.35MSonalika DI 732 III
Power34 HP34 HP
Production years2011–20142006–2016
FuelDieselDiesel
Cylinders33
Displacement1.6 L2.3 L
Weight1 429 kg37 kg
Drive4WD
TransmissionShuttle
Gears (fwd/rev)8 / 2
Rear lift capacity800 kg1 200 kg
Wheelbase167 cm199 cm
Length310 cm357 cm

Frequently asked questions

Which is more powerful, the McCormick Intl X10.35M or the Sonalika DI 732 III?

The McCormick Intl X10.35M and the Sonalika DI 732 III deliver the same power: 34 HP.

Which is more recent, the McCormick Intl X10.35M or the Sonalika DI 732 III?

The McCormick Intl X10.35M is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2006 for the Sonalika DI 732 III.

Which is heavier, the McCormick Intl X10.35M or the Sonalika DI 732 III?

The McCormick Intl X10.35M is heavier: 1429 kg versus 37 kg for the Sonalika DI 732 III.

Which has the higher lift capacity, the McCormick Intl X10.35M or the Sonalika DI 732 III?

The Sonalika DI 732 III offers a higher rear lift capacity: 1200 kg versus 800 kg.

Other comparisons