McCormick Intl X10.75M vs Ursus 5524
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The McCormick Intl X10.75M and the Ursus 5524 deliver the same power: 74 HP.
- The McCormick Intl X10.75M is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2009 for the Ursus 5524.
- The Ursus 5524 is heavier: 3905 kg versus 3514 kg for the McCormick Intl X10.75M.
Full specs comparison
| McCormick Intl X10.75M | Ursus 5524 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 74 HP | 74 HP |
| Production years | 2011–2014 | 2009–2011 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement | 4.4 L | 4.4 L |
| Weight | 3 514 kg | 3 905 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Shuttle | — |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | — | 12 / 4 |
| Rear lift capacity | 2 399 kg | 2 399 kg |
| Wheelbase | 230 cm | — |
| Length | 411 cm | 389 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the McCormick Intl X10.75M or the Ursus 5524?
The McCormick Intl X10.75M and the Ursus 5524 deliver the same power: 74 HP.
Which is more recent, the McCormick Intl X10.75M or the Ursus 5524?
The McCormick Intl X10.75M is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2009 for the Ursus 5524.
Which is heavier, the McCormick Intl X10.75M or the Ursus 5524?
The Ursus 5524 is heavier: 3905 kg versus 3514 kg for the McCormick Intl X10.75M.