McCormick Intl X50.30 vs Pasquali MARS 7.95

Side-by-side specs comparison

McCormick Intl X50.30

McCormick Intl X50.30

90 HP · 2012–2014

View full specs
Pasquali MARS 7.95

Pasquali MARS 7.95

90 HP · 2003–2013

View full specs

Verdict by the numbers

  • The McCormick Intl X50.30 and the Pasquali MARS 7.95 deliver the same power: 90 HP.
  • The McCormick Intl X50.30 is the more recent model: production started in 2012, versus 2003 for the Pasquali MARS 7.95.
  • The McCormick Intl X50.30 is heavier: 3642 kg versus 1850 kg for the Pasquali MARS 7.95.
  • The McCormick Intl X50.30 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 4740 kg versus 2300 kg.

Full specs comparison

McCormick Intl X50.30Pasquali MARS 7.95
Power90 HP90 HP
Production years2012–20142003–2013
FuelDieselDiesel
Cylinders44
Displacement3.4 L3 L
Weight3 642 kg1 850 kg
Drive2WD or 4WD4WD
TransmissionShuttle
Gears (fwd/rev)32 / 12
Rear lift capacity4 740 kg2 300 kg
Wheelbase236 cm145 cm
Length416 cm315 cm
CabYes

Frequently asked questions

Which is more powerful, the McCormick Intl X50.30 or the Pasquali MARS 7.95?

The McCormick Intl X50.30 and the Pasquali MARS 7.95 deliver the same power: 90 HP.

Which is more recent, the McCormick Intl X50.30 or the Pasquali MARS 7.95?

The McCormick Intl X50.30 is the more recent model: production started in 2012, versus 2003 for the Pasquali MARS 7.95.

Which is heavier, the McCormick Intl X50.30 or the Pasquali MARS 7.95?

The McCormick Intl X50.30 is heavier: 3642 kg versus 1850 kg for the Pasquali MARS 7.95.

Which has the higher lift capacity, the McCormick Intl X50.30 or the Pasquali MARS 7.95?

The McCormick Intl X50.30 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 4740 kg versus 2300 kg.

Other comparisons