McCormick Intl X50.30 vs Pasquali MARS 8.95
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The McCormick Intl X50.30 and the Pasquali MARS 8.95 deliver the same power: 90 HP.
- The McCormick Intl X50.30 is the more recent model: production started in 2012, versus 2003 for the Pasquali MARS 8.95.
- The McCormick Intl X50.30 is heavier: 3642 kg versus 1955 kg for the Pasquali MARS 8.95.
- The McCormick Intl X50.30 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 4740 kg versus 2300 kg.
Full specs comparison
| McCormick Intl X50.30 | Pasquali MARS 8.95 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 90 HP | 90 HP |
| Production years | 2012–2014 | 2003–2013 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 4 | 4 |
| Displacement | 3.4 L | 3 L |
| Weight | 3 642 kg | 1 955 kg |
| Drive | 2WD or 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Shuttle | — |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 32 / 12 | — |
| Rear lift capacity | 4 740 kg | 2 300 kg |
| Wheelbase | 236 cm | 145 cm |
| Length | 416 cm | 315 cm |
| Cab | Yes | — |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the McCormick Intl X50.30 or the Pasquali MARS 8.95?
The McCormick Intl X50.30 and the Pasquali MARS 8.95 deliver the same power: 90 HP.
Which is more recent, the McCormick Intl X50.30 or the Pasquali MARS 8.95?
The McCormick Intl X50.30 is the more recent model: production started in 2012, versus 2003 for the Pasquali MARS 8.95.
Which is heavier, the McCormick Intl X50.30 or the Pasquali MARS 8.95?
The McCormick Intl X50.30 is heavier: 3642 kg versus 1955 kg for the Pasquali MARS 8.95.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the McCormick Intl X50.30 or the Pasquali MARS 8.95?
The McCormick Intl X50.30 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 4740 kg versus 2300 kg.

