Cub Cadet 1027 vs John Deere 1600 Turbo
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet 1027: 64 HP versus 9 HP (+55 HP, +611%).
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is the more recent model: production started in 2002, versus 2000 for the Cub Cadet 1027.
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 193 kg for the Cub Cadet 1027.
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo has the wider mower deck: 42" versus 27".
Full specs comparison
| Cub Cadet 1027 | John Deere 1600 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 9 HP | 64 HP |
| Production years | 2000–2002 | 2002–2006 |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 1 | 4 |
| Weight | 193 kg | 1 791 kg |
| Drive | 2WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | — | Hydrostatic |
| Wheelbase | — | 152 cm |
| Length | — | 335 cm |
| Mower deck | 27" | 42" |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Cub Cadet 1027 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet 1027: 64 HP versus 9 HP (+55 HP, +611%).
Which is more recent, the Cub Cadet 1027 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is the more recent model: production started in 2002, versus 2000 for the Cub Cadet 1027.
Which is heavier, the Cub Cadet 1027 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 193 kg for the Cub Cadet 1027.
Which has the wider mower deck, the Cub Cadet 1027 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo has the wider mower deck: 42" versus 27".