Cub Cadet 1525 vs John Deere 1600 Turbo
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet 1525: 64 HP versus 15 HP (+49 HP, +327%).
- The Cub Cadet 1525 is the more recent model: production started in 2003, versus 2002 for the John Deere 1600 Turbo.
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 227 kg for the Cub Cadet 1525.
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo has the wider mower deck: 42" versus 38".
Full specs comparison
| Cub Cadet 1525 | John Deere 1600 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 15 HP | 64 HP |
| Production years | 2003 | 2002–2006 |
| Fuel | Electric | Diesel |
| Cylinders | — | 4 |
| Weight | 227 kg | 1 791 kg |
| Drive | 2WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Gear | Hydrostatic |
| Wheelbase | 119 cm | 152 cm |
| Length | 172 cm | 335 cm |
| Mower deck | 38" | 42" |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Cub Cadet 1525 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet 1525: 64 HP versus 15 HP (+49 HP, +327%).
Which is more recent, the Cub Cadet 1525 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The Cub Cadet 1525 is the more recent model: production started in 2003, versus 2002 for the John Deere 1600 Turbo.
Which is heavier, the Cub Cadet 1525 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 227 kg for the Cub Cadet 1525.
Which has the wider mower deck, the Cub Cadet 1525 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo has the wider mower deck: 42" versus 38".