Cub Cadet 1527 vs John Deere 1600 Turbo
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet 1527: 64 HP versus 17 HP (+47 HP, +276%).
- The Cub Cadet 1527 is the more recent model: production started in 2003, versus 2002 for the John Deere 1600 Turbo.
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 228 kg for the Cub Cadet 1527.
Full specs comparison
| Cub Cadet 1527 | John Deere 1600 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 17 HP | 64 HP |
| Production years | 2003 | 2002–2006 |
| Fuel | Electric | Diesel |
| Cylinders | — | 4 |
| Weight | 228 kg | 1 791 kg |
| Drive | 2WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Gear | Hydrostatic |
| Wheelbase | 119 cm | 152 cm |
| Length | 172 cm | 335 cm |
| Mower deck | 42" | 42" |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Cub Cadet 1527 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet 1527: 64 HP versus 17 HP (+47 HP, +276%).
Which is more recent, the Cub Cadet 1527 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The Cub Cadet 1527 is the more recent model: production started in 2003, versus 2002 for the John Deere 1600 Turbo.
Which is heavier, the Cub Cadet 1527 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 228 kg for the Cub Cadet 1527.