Cub Cadet 1863 vs John Deere 1600 Turbo
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet 1863: 64 HP versus 18 HP (+46 HP, +256%).
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is the more recent model: production started in 2002, versus 1993 for the Cub Cadet 1863.
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 393 kg for the Cub Cadet 1863.
- The Cub Cadet 1863 has the wider mower deck: 44" versus 42".
Full specs comparison
| Cub Cadet 1863 | John Deere 1600 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 18 HP | 64 HP |
| Production years | 1993–1997 | 2002–2006 |
| Fuel | Electric | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 2 | 4 |
| Weight | 393 kg | 1 791 kg |
| Drive | 2WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic |
| Wheelbase | 115 cm | 152 cm |
| Length | 182 cm | 335 cm |
| Mower deck | 44" | 42" |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Cub Cadet 1863 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet 1863: 64 HP versus 18 HP (+46 HP, +256%).
Which is more recent, the Cub Cadet 1863 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is the more recent model: production started in 2002, versus 1993 for the Cub Cadet 1863.
Which is heavier, the Cub Cadet 1863 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 393 kg for the Cub Cadet 1863.
Which has the wider mower deck, the Cub Cadet 1863 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The Cub Cadet 1863 has the wider mower deck: 44" versus 42".