Cub Cadet FMZ 42 SD vs John Deere 1600 Turbo
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet FMZ 42 SD: 64 HP versus 19 HP (+45 HP, +237%).
- The Cub Cadet FMZ 42 SD is the more recent model: production started in 2008, versus 2002 for the John Deere 1600 Turbo.
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 309 kg for the Cub Cadet FMZ 42 SD.
Full specs comparison
| Cub Cadet FMZ 42 SD | John Deere 1600 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 19 HP | 64 HP |
| Production years | 2008–2011 | 2002–2006 |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 1 | 4 |
| Weight | 309 kg | 1 791 kg |
| Drive | 2WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Gear | Hydrostatic |
| Wheelbase | — | 152 cm |
| Length | 228 cm | 335 cm |
| Mower deck | 42" | 42" |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Cub Cadet FMZ 42 SD or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet FMZ 42 SD: 64 HP versus 19 HP (+45 HP, +237%).
Which is more recent, the Cub Cadet FMZ 42 SD or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The Cub Cadet FMZ 42 SD is the more recent model: production started in 2008, versus 2002 for the John Deere 1600 Turbo.
Which is heavier, the Cub Cadet FMZ 42 SD or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 309 kg for the Cub Cadet FMZ 42 SD.