Cub Cadet XT2 LX42 vs John Deere 1600 Turbo
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet XT2 LX42: 64 HP versus 22 HP (+42 HP, +191%).
- The Cub Cadet XT2 LX42 is the more recent model: production started in 2015, versus 2002 for the John Deere 1600 Turbo.
- The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 204 kg for the Cub Cadet XT2 LX42.
Full specs comparison
| Cub Cadet XT2 LX42 | John Deere 1600 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 22 HP | 64 HP |
| Production years | 2015–2025 | 2002–2006 |
| Fuel | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 2 | 4 |
| Weight | 204 kg | 1 791 kg |
| Drive | 2WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Hydrostatic | Hydrostatic |
| Wheelbase | 119 cm | 152 cm |
| Length | 172 cm | 335 cm |
| Cab | Yes | — |
| Mower deck | 42" | 42" |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Cub Cadet XT2 LX42 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is more powerful than the Cub Cadet XT2 LX42: 64 HP versus 22 HP (+42 HP, +191%).
Which is more recent, the Cub Cadet XT2 LX42 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The Cub Cadet XT2 LX42 is the more recent model: production started in 2015, versus 2002 for the John Deere 1600 Turbo.
Which is heavier, the Cub Cadet XT2 LX42 or the John Deere 1600 Turbo?
The John Deere 1600 Turbo is heavier: 1791 kg versus 204 kg for the Cub Cadet XT2 LX42.