Buhler Versatile 435 vs Challenger MT945C
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Challenger MT945C is more powerful than the Buhler Versatile 435: 440 HP versus 435 HP (+5 HP, +1%).
- The Challenger MT945C is the more recent model: production started in 2009, versus 2004 for the Buhler Versatile 435.
- The Buhler Versatile 435 is heavier: 19051 kg versus 17811 kg for the Challenger MT945C.
Full specs comparison
| Buhler Versatile 435 | Challenger MT945C | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 435 HP | 440 HP |
| Production years | 2004–2008 | 2009–2014 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 15 L | 15.1 L |
| Weight | 19 051 kg | 17 811 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Synchronized | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 12 / 4 | 16 / 4 |
| Rear lift capacity | — | 8 845 kg |
| Wheelbase | 391 cm | 394 cm |
| Length | 759 cm | 756 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Buhler Versatile 435 or the Challenger MT945C?
The Challenger MT945C is more powerful than the Buhler Versatile 435: 440 HP versus 435 HP (+5 HP, +1%).
Which is more recent, the Buhler Versatile 435 or the Challenger MT945C?
The Challenger MT945C is the more recent model: production started in 2009, versus 2004 for the Buhler Versatile 435.
Which is heavier, the Buhler Versatile 435 or the Challenger MT945C?
The Buhler Versatile 435 is heavier: 19051 kg versus 17811 kg for the Challenger MT945C.
Other comparisons
Buhler Versatile 435 vs CaseIH Steiger 435Buhler Versatile 435 vs CaseIH STX425QTBuhler Versatile 435 vs CaseIH STX430QTBuhler Versatile 435 vs New Holland TJ425CaseIH Steiger 450 Quadtrac vs Challenger MT945CCaseIH Steiger 450 Rowtrac vs Challenger MT945CChallenger MT945C vs Claas Xerion 4500Challenger MT945C vs Versatile 435