CaseIH 9310 vs McCormick Intl MTX200

Side-by-side specs comparison

CaseIH 9310

CaseIH 9310

205 HP · 1996–1999

View full specs
McCormick Intl MTX200

McCormick Intl MTX200

204 HP · 2003–2005

View full specs

Verdict by the numbers

  • The CaseIH 9310 is more powerful than the McCormick Intl MTX200: 205 HP versus 204 HP (+1 HP, +0%).
  • The McCormick Intl MTX200 is the more recent model: production started in 2003, versus 1996 for the CaseIH 9310.
  • The CaseIH 9310 is heavier: 9537 kg versus 7711 kg for the McCormick Intl MTX200.
  • The McCormick Intl MTX200 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 10951 kg versus 5783 kg.

Full specs comparison

CaseIH 9310McCormick Intl MTX200
Power205 HP204 HP
Production years1996–19992003–2005
FuelDieselDiesel
Cylinders66
Displacement8.3 L5.9 L
Weight9 537 kg7 711 kg
Drive4WD4WD
TransmissionPower shiftPower shift
Gears (fwd/rev)12 / 316 / 12
Rear lift capacity5 783 kg10 951 kg
Wheelbase304 cm286 cm
Length614 cm523 cm
CabYesYes

Frequently asked questions

Which is more powerful, the CaseIH 9310 or the McCormick Intl MTX200?

The CaseIH 9310 is more powerful than the McCormick Intl MTX200: 205 HP versus 204 HP (+1 HP, +0%).

Which is more recent, the CaseIH 9310 or the McCormick Intl MTX200?

The McCormick Intl MTX200 is the more recent model: production started in 2003, versus 1996 for the CaseIH 9310.

Which is heavier, the CaseIH 9310 or the McCormick Intl MTX200?

The CaseIH 9310 is heavier: 9537 kg versus 7711 kg for the McCormick Intl MTX200.

Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH 9310 or the McCormick Intl MTX200?

The McCormick Intl MTX200 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 10951 kg versus 5783 kg.

Other comparisons