McCormick Intl MTX200 vs Renault Ares 836
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Renault Ares 836 is more powerful than the McCormick Intl MTX200: 205 HP versus 204 HP (+1 HP, +0%).
- The McCormick Intl MTX200 is the more recent model: production started in 2003, versus 2002 for the Renault Ares 836.
- The Renault Ares 836 is heavier: 8321 kg versus 7711 kg for the McCormick Intl MTX200.
- The Renault Ares 836 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 11332 kg versus 10951 kg.
Full specs comparison
| McCormick Intl MTX200 | Renault Ares 836 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 HP | 205 HP |
| Production years | 2003–2005 | 2002–2003 |
| Fuel | Diesel | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 5.9 L | 6.8 L |
| Weight | 7 711 kg | 8 321 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | — |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 16 / 12 | — |
| Rear lift capacity | 10 951 kg | 11 332 kg |
| Wheelbase | 286 cm | 288 cm |
| Length | 523 cm | 462 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the McCormick Intl MTX200 or the Renault Ares 836?
The Renault Ares 836 is more powerful than the McCormick Intl MTX200: 205 HP versus 204 HP (+1 HP, +0%).
Which is more recent, the McCormick Intl MTX200 or the Renault Ares 836?
The McCormick Intl MTX200 is the more recent model: production started in 2003, versus 2002 for the Renault Ares 836.
Which is heavier, the McCormick Intl MTX200 or the Renault Ares 836?
The Renault Ares 836 is heavier: 8321 kg versus 7711 kg for the McCormick Intl MTX200.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the McCormick Intl MTX200 or the Renault Ares 836?
The Renault Ares 836 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 11332 kg versus 10951 kg.