CaseIH CS 68 vs Challenger MT325B
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH CS 68 and the Challenger MT325B deliver the same power: 68 HP.
- The Challenger MT325B is the more recent model: production started in 2006, versus 1994 for the CaseIH CS 68.
- The CaseIH CS 68 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 2610 kg versus 2494 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH CS 68 | Challenger MT325B | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 68 HP | 68 HP |
| Production years | 1994–2004 | 2006–2009 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 3 | 3 |
| Displacement | 3.3 L | 3.3 L |
| Drive | 2WD or 4WD | 2WD or 4WD |
| Transmission | Synchronized | Shuttle |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 16 / 8 | — |
| Rear lift capacity | 2 610 kg | 2 494 kg |
| Wheelbase | 223 cm | 210 cm |
| Length | — | 375 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH CS 68 or the Challenger MT325B?
The CaseIH CS 68 and the Challenger MT325B deliver the same power: 68 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH CS 68 or the Challenger MT325B?
The Challenger MT325B is the more recent model: production started in 2006, versus 1994 for the CaseIH CS 68.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH CS 68 or the Challenger MT325B?
The CaseIH CS 68 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 2610 kg versus 2494 kg.