Challenger MT325B vs McCormick Intl C75 Max
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Challenger MT325B and the McCormick Intl C75 Max deliver the same power: 68 HP.
- The Challenger MT325B is the more recent model: production started in 2006, versus 2004 for the McCormick Intl C75 Max.
- The McCormick Intl C75 Max offers a higher rear lift capacity: 2600 kg versus 2494 kg.
Full specs comparison
| Challenger MT325B | McCormick Intl C75 Max | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 68 HP | 68 HP |
| Production years | 2006–2009 | 2004–2007 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 3 | 4 |
| Displacement | 3.3 L | 4.4 L |
| Weight | — | 3 250 kg |
| Drive | 2WD or 4WD | 2WD or 4WD |
| Transmission | Shuttle | — |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | — | 24 / 12 |
| Rear lift capacity | 2 494 kg | 2 600 kg |
| Wheelbase | 210 cm | 234 cm |
| Length | 375 cm | 413 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the Challenger MT325B or the McCormick Intl C75 Max?
The Challenger MT325B and the McCormick Intl C75 Max deliver the same power: 68 HP.
Which is more recent, the Challenger MT325B or the McCormick Intl C75 Max?
The Challenger MT325B is the more recent model: production started in 2006, versus 2004 for the McCormick Intl C75 Max.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the Challenger MT325B or the McCormick Intl C75 Max?
The McCormick Intl C75 Max offers a higher rear lift capacity: 2600 kg versus 2494 kg.