CaseIH Puma 130 vs McCormick Intl X7.440
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 130 and the McCormick Intl X7.440 deliver the same power: 131 HP.
- The McCormick Intl X7.440 is the more recent model: production started in 2013, versus 2011 for the CaseIH Puma 130.
- The CaseIH Puma 130 is heavier: 6168 kg versus 5751 kg for the McCormick Intl X7.440.
- The McCormick Intl X7.440 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 9298 kg versus 3583 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 130 | McCormick Intl X7.440 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 131 HP | 131 HP |
| Production years | 2011–2013 | 2013–2023 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 4.5 L |
| Weight | 6 168 kg | 5 751 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | — |
| Rear lift capacity | 3 583 kg | 9 298 kg |
| Wheelbase | 273 cm | 260 cm |
| Length | — | 303 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 130 or the McCormick Intl X7.440?
The CaseIH Puma 130 and the McCormick Intl X7.440 deliver the same power: 131 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 130 or the McCormick Intl X7.440?
The McCormick Intl X7.440 is the more recent model: production started in 2013, versus 2011 for the CaseIH Puma 130.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 130 or the McCormick Intl X7.440?
The CaseIH Puma 130 is heavier: 6168 kg versus 5751 kg for the McCormick Intl X7.440.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 130 or the McCormick Intl X7.440?
The McCormick Intl X7.440 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 9298 kg versus 3583 kg.
Other comparisons
CaseIH Puma 130 vs Fendt 413 VarioCaseIH Puma 130 vs New Holland T6.160CaseIH Puma 130 vs New Holland T6060 EliteCaseIH Puma 130 vs Zetor Forterra 125Kubota M6132 vs McCormick Intl X7.440Landini Landpower 135 vs McCormick Intl X7.440Landini Landpower II 135 vs McCormick Intl X7.440McCormick Intl X7.440 vs New Holland T6.160