CaseIH Puma 160 vs Fendt Favorit 716 Vario
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 160 and the Fendt Favorit 716 Vario deliver the same power: 160 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 160 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 1998 for the Fendt Favorit 716 Vario.
- The CaseIH Puma 160 is heavier: 7420 kg versus 6201 kg for the Fendt Favorit 716 Vario.
- The Fendt Favorit 716 Vario offers a higher rear lift capacity: 8599 kg versus 3583 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 160 | Fendt Favorit 716 Vario | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 160 HP | 160 HP |
| Production years | 2011–2013 | 1998–2003 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 5.7 L |
| Weight | 7 420 kg | 6 201 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | — |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | — |
| Rear lift capacity | 3 583 kg | 8 599 kg |
| Wheelbase | 273 cm | 283 cm |
| Length | — | 462 cm |
| Cab | Yes | — |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Fendt Favorit 716 Vario?
The CaseIH Puma 160 and the Fendt Favorit 716 Vario deliver the same power: 160 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Fendt Favorit 716 Vario?
The CaseIH Puma 160 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 1998 for the Fendt Favorit 716 Vario.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Fendt Favorit 716 Vario?
The CaseIH Puma 160 is heavier: 7420 kg versus 6201 kg for the Fendt Favorit 716 Vario.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the Fendt Favorit 716 Vario?
The Fendt Favorit 716 Vario offers a higher rear lift capacity: 8599 kg versus 3583 kg.
Other comparisons
CaseIH Puma 160 vs Fendt 516 VarioCaseIH Puma 160 vs Landini Landpower 165CaseIH Puma 160 vs McCormick Intl X7.460CaseIH Puma 160 vs Valtra T151eDeutz-Fahr Agrotron 160 vs Fendt Favorit 716 VarioDeutz-Fahr Agrotron 165 MK3 vs Fendt Favorit 716 VarioFendt Favorit 716 Vario vs John Deere 6920S PremiumFendt Favorit 716 Vario vs McCormick Intl MTX155