CaseIH Puma 160 vs John Deere 6140M
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 160 and the John Deere 6140M deliver the same power: 160 HP.
- The John Deere 6140M is the more recent model: production started in 2020, versus 2011 for the CaseIH Puma 160.
- The CaseIH Puma 160 is heavier: 7420 kg versus 5799 kg for the John Deere 6140M.
- The John Deere 6140M offers a higher rear lift capacity: 5000 kg versus 3583 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 160 | John Deere 6140M | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 160 HP | 160 HP |
| Production years | 2011–2013 | 2020–2024 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 4 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 4.5 L |
| Weight | 7 420 kg | 5 799 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 2WD or 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | — |
| Rear lift capacity | 3 583 kg | 5 000 kg |
| Wheelbase | 273 cm | 258 cm |
| Length | — | 448 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the John Deere 6140M?
The CaseIH Puma 160 and the John Deere 6140M deliver the same power: 160 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the John Deere 6140M?
The John Deere 6140M is the more recent model: production started in 2020, versus 2011 for the CaseIH Puma 160.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the John Deere 6140M?
The CaseIH Puma 160 is heavier: 7420 kg versus 5799 kg for the John Deere 6140M.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the John Deere 6140M?
The John Deere 6140M offers a higher rear lift capacity: 5000 kg versus 3583 kg.