CaseIH Puma 160 vs SAME Titan 160
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 160 is more powerful than the SAME Titan 160: 160 HP versus 159 HP (+1 HP, +1%).
- The CaseIH Puma 160 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 1991 for the SAME Titan 160.
- The CaseIH Puma 160 is heavier: 7420 kg versus 5800 kg for the SAME Titan 160.
- The SAME Titan 160 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6999 kg versus 3583 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 160 | SAME Titan 160 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 160 HP | 159 HP |
| Production years | 2011–2013 | 1991–1998 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 6 L |
| Weight | 7 420 kg | 5 800 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | — |
| Rear lift capacity | 3 583 kg | 6 999 kg |
| Wheelbase | 273 cm | 284 cm |
| Length | — | 474 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the SAME Titan 160?
The CaseIH Puma 160 is more powerful than the SAME Titan 160: 160 HP versus 159 HP (+1 HP, +1%).
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the SAME Titan 160?
The CaseIH Puma 160 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 1991 for the SAME Titan 160.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the SAME Titan 160?
The CaseIH Puma 160 is heavier: 7420 kg versus 5800 kg for the SAME Titan 160.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 160 or the SAME Titan 160?
The SAME Titan 160 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6999 kg versus 3583 kg.