CaseIH Puma 170 vs JCB Fastrac 155
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The JCB Fastrac 155 is more powerful than the CaseIH Puma 170: 168 HP versus 167 HP (+1 HP, +1%).
- The CaseIH Puma 170 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 1993 for the JCB Fastrac 155.
- The CaseIH Puma 170 is heavier: 8500 kg versus 6520 kg for the JCB Fastrac 155.
- The JCB Fastrac 155 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6001 kg versus 4626 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 170 | JCB Fastrac 155 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 167 HP | 168 HP |
| Production years | 2011–2013 | 1993–1997 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 6 L |
| Weight | 8 500 kg | 6 520 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Synchronized |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | 36 / 12 |
| Rear lift capacity | 4 626 kg | 6 001 kg |
| Wheelbase | 288 cm | 300 cm |
| Length | — | 576 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 170 or the JCB Fastrac 155?
The JCB Fastrac 155 is more powerful than the CaseIH Puma 170: 168 HP versus 167 HP (+1 HP, +1%).
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 170 or the JCB Fastrac 155?
The CaseIH Puma 170 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 1993 for the JCB Fastrac 155.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 170 or the JCB Fastrac 155?
The CaseIH Puma 170 is heavier: 8500 kg versus 6520 kg for the JCB Fastrac 155.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 170 or the JCB Fastrac 155?
The JCB Fastrac 155 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6001 kg versus 4626 kg.