CaseIH Puma 170 vs Massey Ferguson 7490
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The Massey Ferguson 7490 is more powerful than the CaseIH Puma 170: 168 HP versus 167 HP (+1 HP, +1%).
- The CaseIH Puma 170 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2004 for the Massey Ferguson 7490.
- The CaseIH Puma 170 is heavier: 8500 kg versus 6869 kg for the Massey Ferguson 7490.
- The Massey Ferguson 7490 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6478 kg versus 4626 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 170 | Massey Ferguson 7490 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 167 HP | 168 HP |
| Production years | 2011–2013 | 2004–2012 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 6.6 L |
| Weight | 8 500 kg | 6 869 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | — |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | 21 / 18 |
| Rear lift capacity | 4 626 kg | 6 478 kg |
| Wheelbase | 288 cm | 301 cm |
| Length | — | 522 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 170 or the Massey Ferguson 7490?
The Massey Ferguson 7490 is more powerful than the CaseIH Puma 170: 168 HP versus 167 HP (+1 HP, +1%).
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 170 or the Massey Ferguson 7490?
The CaseIH Puma 170 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2004 for the Massey Ferguson 7490.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 170 or the Massey Ferguson 7490?
The CaseIH Puma 170 is heavier: 8500 kg versus 6869 kg for the Massey Ferguson 7490.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 170 or the Massey Ferguson 7490?
The Massey Ferguson 7490 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 6478 kg versus 4626 kg.
Other comparisons
AGCO RT150 vs Massey Ferguson 7490CaseIH Puma 170 vs Deutz-Fahr TTV 620CaseIH Puma 170 vs John Deere 7430 PremiumCaseIH Puma 170 vs McCormick Intl X7.670CaseIH Puma 170 vs New Holland T7.220Challenger MT565B vs Massey Ferguson 7490John Deere 6170R vs Massey Ferguson 7490Massey Ferguson 7490 vs Ursus 1734