CaseIH Puma 195 vs McCormick Intl XTX200
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 195 and the McCormick Intl XTX200 deliver the same power: 195 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 195 is the more recent model: production started in 2007, versus 2005 for the McCormick Intl XTX200.
- The McCormick Intl XTX200 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 10951 kg versus 5800 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 195 | McCormick Intl XTX200 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 195 HP | 195 HP |
| Production years | 2007–2010 | 2005–2007 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 6.7 L |
| Weight | 7 999 kg | — |
| Drive | 2WD or 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 17 / 6 | 32 / 24 |
| Rear lift capacity | 5 800 kg | 10 951 kg |
| Wheelbase | 288 cm | 287 cm |
| Length | — | 530 cm |
| Cab | Yes | — |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 195 or the McCormick Intl XTX200?
The CaseIH Puma 195 and the McCormick Intl XTX200 deliver the same power: 195 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 195 or the McCormick Intl XTX200?
The CaseIH Puma 195 is the more recent model: production started in 2007, versus 2005 for the McCormick Intl XTX200.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 195 or the McCormick Intl XTX200?
The McCormick Intl XTX200 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 10951 kg versus 5800 kg.