CaseIH Puma 195 vs McCormick Intl XTX215
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 195 is more powerful than the McCormick Intl XTX215: 195 HP versus 193 HP (+2 HP, +1%).
- The CaseIH Puma 195 is the more recent model: production started in 2007, versus 2005 for the McCormick Intl XTX215.
- The CaseIH Puma 195 is heavier: 7999 kg versus 7262 kg for the McCormick Intl XTX215.
- The McCormick Intl XTX215 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 10951 kg versus 5800 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 195 | McCormick Intl XTX215 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 195 HP | 193 HP |
| Production years | 2007–2010 | 2005–2007 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 6.7 L |
| Weight | 7 999 kg | 7 262 kg |
| Drive | 2WD or 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 17 / 6 | 32 / 24 |
| Rear lift capacity | 5 800 kg | 10 951 kg |
| Wheelbase | 288 cm | 287 cm |
| Length | — | 530 cm |
| Cab | Yes | — |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 195 or the McCormick Intl XTX215?
The CaseIH Puma 195 is more powerful than the McCormick Intl XTX215: 195 HP versus 193 HP (+2 HP, +1%).
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 195 or the McCormick Intl XTX215?
The CaseIH Puma 195 is the more recent model: production started in 2007, versus 2005 for the McCormick Intl XTX215.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 195 or the McCormick Intl XTX215?
The CaseIH Puma 195 is heavier: 7999 kg versus 7262 kg for the McCormick Intl XTX215.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 195 or the McCormick Intl XTX215?
The McCormick Intl XTX215 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 10951 kg versus 5800 kg.