CaseIH Puma 210 vs IMT 5210
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 210 and the IMT 5210 deliver the same power: 210 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 210 is the more recent model: production started in 2007, versus 1997 for the IMT 5210.
- The IMT 5210 is heavier: 8171 kg versus 8126 kg for the CaseIH Puma 210.
- The CaseIH Puma 210 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 5800 kg versus 5000 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 210 | IMT 5210 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 HP | 210 HP |
| Production years | 2007–2010 | 1997–2007 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 11.3 L |
| Weight | 8 126 kg | 8 171 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Synchronized |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | 16 / 4 |
| Rear lift capacity | 5 800 kg | 5 000 kg |
| Wheelbase | 288 cm | — |
| Length | — | 513 cm |
| Cab | Yes | — |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 210 or the IMT 5210?
The CaseIH Puma 210 and the IMT 5210 deliver the same power: 210 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 210 or the IMT 5210?
The CaseIH Puma 210 is the more recent model: production started in 2007, versus 1997 for the IMT 5210.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 210 or the IMT 5210?
The IMT 5210 is heavier: 8171 kg versus 8126 kg for the CaseIH Puma 210.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 210 or the IMT 5210?
The CaseIH Puma 210 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 5800 kg versus 5000 kg.