CaseIH Puma 210 vs New Holland 8870
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 210 and the New Holland 8870 deliver the same power: 210 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 210 is the more recent model: production started in 2007, versus 1993 for the New Holland 8870.
- The CaseIH Puma 210 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 5800 kg versus 5670 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 210 | New Holland 8870 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 HP | 210 HP |
| Production years | 2007–2010 | 1993–2000 |
| Fuel | Diesel | — |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 7.5 L |
| Weight | 8 126 kg | — |
| Drive | 4WD | 2WD or 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | 16 / 9 |
| Rear lift capacity | 5 800 kg | 5 670 kg |
| Wheelbase | 288 cm | 300 cm |
| Length | — | 499 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 210 or the New Holland 8870?
The CaseIH Puma 210 and the New Holland 8870 deliver the same power: 210 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 210 or the New Holland 8870?
The CaseIH Puma 210 is the more recent model: production started in 2007, versus 1993 for the New Holland 8870.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 210 or the New Holland 8870?
The CaseIH Puma 210 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 5800 kg versus 5670 kg.
Other comparisons
CaseIH 9310 vs New Holland 8870CaseIH Puma 210 vs Deutz-Fahr Argotron L 720CaseIH Puma 210 vs Deutz-Fahr Argotron L 730CaseIH Puma 210 vs John Deere 7920CaseIH Puma 210 vs New Holland T7060Challenger MT645 vs New Holland 8870ADeutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 MK3 vs New Holland 8870ADeutz-Fahr Agrotron 200 vs New Holland 8870A