CaseIH Puma 210 vs White 4-180
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 210 and the White 4-180 deliver the same power: 210 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 210 is the more recent model: production started in 2007, versus 1975 for the White 4-180.
- The White 4-180 is heavier: 9344 kg versus 8126 kg for the CaseIH Puma 210.
- The CaseIH Puma 210 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 5800 kg versus 2721 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 210 | White 4-180 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 HP | 210 HP |
| Production years | 2007–2010 | 1975–1978 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 8 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 10.4 L |
| Weight | 8 126 kg | 9 344 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | Gear |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | 12 / 4 |
| Rear lift capacity | 5 800 kg | 2 721 kg |
| Wheelbase | 288 cm | 293 cm |
| Length | — | 604 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 210 or the White 4-180?
The CaseIH Puma 210 and the White 4-180 deliver the same power: 210 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 210 or the White 4-180?
The CaseIH Puma 210 is the more recent model: production started in 2007, versus 1975 for the White 4-180.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 210 or the White 4-180?
The White 4-180 is heavier: 9344 kg versus 8126 kg for the CaseIH Puma 210.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 210 or the White 4-180?
The CaseIH Puma 210 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 5800 kg versus 2721 kg.