CaseIH Puma 210 vs XTZ XTZ-16131
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 210 and the XTZ XTZ-16131 deliver the same power: 210 HP.
- The XTZ XTZ-16131 is heavier: 8618 kg versus 8126 kg for the CaseIH Puma 210.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 210 | XTZ XTZ-16131 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 HP | 210 HP |
| Production years | 2007–2010 | — |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 7.1 L |
| Weight | 8 126 kg | 8 618 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | — |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | 16 / 8 |
| Rear lift capacity | 5 800 kg | — |
| Wheelbase | 288 cm | 286 cm |
| Length | — | 664 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 210 or the XTZ XTZ-16131?
The CaseIH Puma 210 and the XTZ XTZ-16131 deliver the same power: 210 HP.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 210 or the XTZ XTZ-16131?
The XTZ XTZ-16131 is heavier: 8618 kg versus 8126 kg for the CaseIH Puma 210.