CaseIH Puma 215 vs Challenger MT595B
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 215 and the Challenger MT595B deliver the same power: 215 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 215 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2010 for the Challenger MT595B.
- The CaseIH Puma 215 is heavier: 8110 kg versus 7439 kg for the Challenger MT595B.
- The Challenger MT595B offers a higher rear lift capacity: 7321 kg versus 4626 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 215 | Challenger MT595B | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 215 HP | 215 HP |
| Production years | 2011–2013 | 2010–2012 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 7.4 L |
| Weight | 8 110 kg | 7 439 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission | Power shift | CVT |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | 18 / 6 | — |
| Rear lift capacity | 4 626 kg | 7 321 kg |
| Wheelbase | 288 cm | 299 cm |
| Length | — | 506 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 215 or the Challenger MT595B?
The CaseIH Puma 215 and the Challenger MT595B deliver the same power: 215 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 215 or the Challenger MT595B?
The CaseIH Puma 215 is the more recent model: production started in 2011, versus 2010 for the Challenger MT595B.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 215 or the Challenger MT595B?
The CaseIH Puma 215 is heavier: 8110 kg versus 7439 kg for the Challenger MT595B.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 215 or the Challenger MT595B?
The Challenger MT595B offers a higher rear lift capacity: 7321 kg versus 4626 kg.