CaseIH Puma 225 vs John Deere 8130
Side-by-side specs comparison
Verdict by the numbers
- The CaseIH Puma 225 and the John Deere 8130 deliver the same power: 225 HP.
- The CaseIH Puma 225 is the more recent model: production started in 2009, versus 2006 for the John Deere 8130.
- The John Deere 8130 is heavier: 9876 kg versus 7484 kg for the CaseIH Puma 225.
- The CaseIH Puma 225 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 5800 kg versus 5624 kg.
Full specs comparison
| CaseIH Puma 225 | John Deere 8130 | |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 225 HP | 225 HP |
| Production years | 2009–2010 | 2006–2009 |
| Fuel | Diesel | Diesel |
| Cylinders | 6 | 6 |
| Displacement | 6.7 L | 9 L |
| Weight | 7 484 kg | 9 876 kg |
| Drive | 4WD | 2WD or 4WD |
| Transmission | CVT | Power shift |
| Gears (fwd/rev) | — | 16 / 4 |
| Rear lift capacity | 5 800 kg | 5 624 kg |
| Wheelbase | 288 cm | 302 cm |
| Length | — | 556 cm |
| Cab | Yes | Yes |
Frequently asked questions
Which is more powerful, the CaseIH Puma 225 or the John Deere 8130?
The CaseIH Puma 225 and the John Deere 8130 deliver the same power: 225 HP.
Which is more recent, the CaseIH Puma 225 or the John Deere 8130?
The CaseIH Puma 225 is the more recent model: production started in 2009, versus 2006 for the John Deere 8130.
Which is heavier, the CaseIH Puma 225 or the John Deere 8130?
The John Deere 8130 is heavier: 9876 kg versus 7484 kg for the CaseIH Puma 225.
Which has the higher lift capacity, the CaseIH Puma 225 or the John Deere 8130?
The CaseIH Puma 225 offers a higher rear lift capacity: 5800 kg versus 5624 kg.